12 Jan 2024 6:20 pm
Cannonpointer » 12 Jan 2024, 7:12 pm » wrote: ↑ I used to put great store by the Lancet - until they blew any and all credibility by lying that anyone who suggested lab origin of covid was a conspiracy theorist -and then a year later admitted the likelihood of lab origin, WITHOUT addressing and apologizing for their previous lie.
Whether the vax in fact ameliorated by one or more of the emergency-use-only experimental "vaccines" is utterly irrelevant to the question of how much damage those "vaccines" are causing.
Preventing sniffles is a lovely thing, so long as you are not CAUSING myocarditis and other mortal issues.
The science is in on the "vaxes" - they're rendering women and men sterile, they're killing people smack in the middle of their most productive years, and they're causing athletes to collapse on the field at unprecedented rates. They are positively correlated with a 40% jump in deaths in the cohort between 25 and 50. The Lancet's narrow study does not even look into these issues.
We anti-mRNA folks have shown TONS of peer reviewed science proving all of this and more in a stickied thread called "Weight the risks of the vaccine." Even if every conclusion your study from the once great, now-discredited Lancet proves accurate, it does nothing to change the fact that Ivermectin is safer and MORE effective - cheaper and less risky.
And again, COPIOUS peer reviewed science backs this up, and is available in the thread I just named.
Fascists that want to make health decisions for others are the worst. Abortion should be between a woman and her doctor - it is NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS.
Same with my "vax" status, ya nosy creep. My natural immunity is something like 19 times more powerful than vax immunity - according to fauci. Get a clue, son.
I guess I should value your credentialed review of The Lancet.
Either way, take a look at the other studies I posted. Hell, look them up yourself. These studies have been replicated. Do you even know what that means? Doubtful.