12 Jan 2024 9:18 pm
Cannonpointer » 12 Jan 2024, 10:12 pm » wrote: ↑ No, I won't be going down this road with you.
If you wish to pretend we were not told that, I'm okay with it.
Let's pretend it together, and just dismiss that evidence. I do not care to go get proof of the lies we all know were told, when you will simply respond by making a new dishonest demand.
You said I could not publish peer reviewed science. I did - over and over. Then you demanded I quote it. I did. more than once. Then you said so what.
So here is what:
1. You were incorrect
2. Your team lies
3. The "vax" is experimental
4. Coercing people to participate in medical experiments is a crime against humanity under international law
No, you didn't. You went through your thread and posted things that never backed your claim. You quoted a review article with theories. You said it was a study, but it wasn't. You could have determine that in 5 seconds when IF you had seen there was no methodology. It wasn't even a meta review.
Your other "study" was an editorial about a Lancet study. The Lancet study concluded that a 3rd booster was recommended.
Post an actual peer reviewed study. Not stories about whisteblowers and what the media told you.