Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
11,822 posts
R. » wrote:
Beekeeper » 19 Apr 2024, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑
You also have to take into consideration who you are dealing with.
"Smart" has never been something she was accused of being. Ever.
What did your source give as the reason for the decision?
Beekeeper » 19 Apr 2024, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑
I'm NOT your reading comprehension advisor, ****!!!
Read the judges ruling for YOURSELF and then decide what their REASON WAS!!
Seems there was NO CASE to be made and NO EVIDENCE to back up the claims the Bar Association tried to use to disbar her.
You had no idea what was in your OP..