8 Aug 2018 7:25 am
Speaking of "Andrew Jackson"...peepee » 08 Aug 2018 7:12 am » wrote:...good point...steve zarlenga claimed that a much larger percentage of the population (although still a small minority) understood the hideous nature of our monetary order at one time...**** creek/indago/babbling cyndi-level monetary ignoramuses have ALWAYS been the majority, but today it is MUCH worse... today, **** creek/ignoramo/snookered cyndi-level republicrat monetary ignoramuses are the OVERWHELMING majority...monetary ignorance RULE$ virtually unchallenged today...especially among the **** idiots who support republicans and democrats....Cannonpointer » 06 Aug 2018 7:13 am » wrote:The memory hole looms large - just look at the spate of publicly subsidized bank failures under reaganomics. Now less than one per decade for the past 4 decades. It only took the public 50 years to forget why FDR's regulations were in place.
The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger centers has owned the Government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson — and I am not wholly excepting the Administration of W. W. The country is going through a repetition of Jackson's fight with the Bank of the United States — only on a far bigger and broader basis.Letter to Col. Edward Mandell House (21 November 1933); as quoted in F.D.R.: His Personal Letters, 1928-1945, edited by Elliott Roosevelt (New York: Duell, Sloan and Pearce, 1950), pg. 373
POSTED