16 Jul 2018 8:59 am
Phuckwad fudge packer peewee.peepee » 16 Jul 2018 7:40 am » wrote:Hat_Creek » 13 Jul 2018 1:52 pm » wrote:Why limit the situation we have to the Fed Res?
They are merely an underling of the IMF aka "The Bank". (Not the same definition of "a Bank")
Why don't we take the audience deeper into the rabbit hole?
The question then becomes: How did the IMF aka Fed Res, gain constitutional authority to
create "money", then lend it back to the US with interest applied?
...you STILL don't even understand how dollars come into 'existence' and now you want to blatherabout 'the imf'!... [i believe you'll find 'the imf' is small potatoe$ when compared to 'the fed' as to 'dollar creation/issuance'...but i doubt we can ever truly know as you ****-heel republicans and democrats gave away the farm a loooong time ago...no HONEST INDEPENDENT TRANSPARENT audit$... EVER...and not an intelligent peep about this monstro$ity from ANY of your ****-heel republicans/crats...EVER..but you know all about peter strzok and 'horseface page'!..you get all worked about that...because your head is full of ****...[gee, i wonder why!]
...btw, 'constitutional authority' is adjudicated by, ESSENTIALLY, 'the bankster$,' *******...maybe you'd understand that if your head wasn't filled with republican-radio-level talking/squawking points...
[...new private dildo comment time over/under: 12 hours...the overs won last time]
I thought we'd have a discussion like men but now you went into the deep end of
the pool with lead boots on. You're to retarded to converse with. So I'll send you
to school on the short bus and after you learn sumthin, come back and maybe I'll
learn you some more.
Go look up this person. Dig deep boy.
John McCloy
We can't move on until you discuss this one question:
How did the IMF aka Fed Res, gain constitutional authority to
create "money", then lend it back to the US with interest applied?