16 Feb 2024 7:18 am
(PART III OF III)
I wrote: "Very well. Nonetheless, Cannonpointer supports National "Socialism"... Indeed, since the Nazis severely reduced tax rates, worker pay, and pension contributions, most of the German capitalist class didn't have a problem with the said arrangement. Why would they?"
Cannonpointer: "There you go again with the canard that Hitler cut wages yet was beloved - without a shred of evidence. And what's your evidence that I 'support national socialism?' The fact that I was curious as to your take on it? Or the fact that I met your take with criticism? For me to full-on support national socialism would require a great deal more study than I have ever been willing to invest. That's more of that bi-valent thinking. Unless I despise and detest and DISMISS national socialism, I AM a national socialist. Have you any idea how silly that is?"
The book that the following website mentions is pricey and, therefore, not something the casual reader would care to order. Still, it's an astoundingly well-documented writing that shows that the Nazis did indeed slash the pay and benefits of Germany's workers to finance their scheme. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24455387 A more accessible yet less credible source, at least concerning this neo-Nazi-infested forum, is the following article: https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics ... -elections
Concerning Cannonpointer's comments denying supporting National "Socialism," I apologize for painting him otherwise. I misunderstood his position. And, as mentioned in my previous post, I'm interested in knowing what economic system that wouldn't entail the private ownership of the means of wealth production he does advocate. Per his not being a National "Socialist," I wonder what he is politically speaking.
(END PART III)
Be well
Good day
"Harvey Mushman"