Yesterday 7:52 pm
Pauper?Zeets2 » Today, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Is that how you go through life? Just reading headlines and ignoring the body of the story to learn the entire scope of the topic?
Is it any wonder why you're such a pauper and a loser?
Something tells me you don't have two coins to rub together, Clete.
It worked fine for me.Zeets2 » Today, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑ As far as your own deductive reasoning goes, reading just a headline DOES NOT qualify you to comment on the facts in the remainder of the article.
When the headline of your source refutes you, you're pretty stupid to use that source.
It becomes obvious that you just grab **** and slam it without even looking at it - a Gish Galloper who posts **** unworthy of attention.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?