Yesterday 5:08 pm
I view it more from the perspective of the express powers it grants, rather than how it represents each ancestor alive.31stArrival » Today, 4:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Instead of believing what social consensus believes the Constitution means, what do you understand about how it represents each ancestor alive?
I've studied it a bit over the years, and I never really noticed that the Founders were interested in that Document representing each ancestor alive. Or representing ANYONE - living or dead, ancestral or modern. The Document's intent, and the intent of the founding generation, was to define and grant limited powers to offices of government.
The people in the offices created, defined, and limited by the Constitution were the ones expected to represent each ancestor alive now. The Constitution itself, no - not its job.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?