Vegas » Today, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/718b9/718b9cc3dc77b7d8e00b997bece86ac1c72c8d43" alt="Image"
Of course you want to judge. You are dishonest. Duh.
No, Cannon judges. period.
**** your cowardice.
@Cannonpointer any chance you want to judge something?
It's what I live for.
Vegas » Today, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑
Veghead said that he could prove that both of these examples are not examples of survivorship bias. If he can, then I have to disembowel myself on my uncle's porch. I agreed. BTW, the idiot only read the first 5 words, he never read the whole **** thing. He will do it again. he will only talk about the first 5 words, and then claim that he debunked it.
With abated breath, I look forward to judging these things.
It will give me a good reason to hastily google and immediately comprehend in minute detail every aspect of the concept "survivorship bias."
How hard can it be? I'm smaht. Not dumb, like people say. I'm smaht. And I want RESPECT!
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?