Today 1:49 pm
1. He laughed when he said just checking for a pulse. A jest is not a lie.jerrab » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I never said they should not respond. an x would prove they have a pulse. he asked for more than if they had a pulse. an x would suffice-- he wanted details of the work they did but he said at the cabinet meeting he was just checking for a pulse which was a lie- he also said lied when he said all he was doing was checking on computers.
2. His reference to being tech support was not an affirmative oath that he was up to no other business. Quite the contrary. His business was clearly stated in that same exposition - the business of ending the deficits. His COMPLAINT, made in jest as well, was that he was forced to do tech support in order to accomplish his ACTUAL mission.
I don't know who dishonestly explicated that video for you, because you are clearly ashamed of your sources. But the emPHAsis is on the wrong syLLAble.
You and I watched the same video. What you took from it was, in my opinion, spoon fed to you by someone who is as good at their job of propagandizing you as you are bad at your job of resisting being propagandized. There just WASN'T WHAT YOU SAID in that video. If there were any lies, they were not the lies you complain of. Musk did not pretend he is "only" tech support, and musk did not claim IN ADULT SERIOUSNESS that his only motivation in sending the email was to check a pulse. But that IS the primary reason for the emails - to make sure this is a real worker and not a dummy account put in place to receive taxpayer monies through fraud. These are things that a responsible audit look for - and they are doing a **** audit, in case you missed that part of our ongoing saga.
An AUDIT. To check EVERYTHING. To find waste. To find fraud. To find abuse (which seems redundant to me). And you're bitching about it. WHY THE ****?
Where is your dog in this fight? Why would you resist having the BLOATED, over-weaning federal government audited for waste, fraud and abuse?
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?