*GHETTOBLASTER » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
Search Assist
The number of farm workers needed to feed 1,000 people can vary widely based on agricultural practices and crop types. However,
one U.S. farmer can produce enough food to feed approximately 155 people, so it would take about 6 to 7 farmers to feed 1,000 people.
So if our farms were manned with nothing but Mexicans it would take 2.5MM of them to feed 350MM Americans.
This gives you some sense of scale...although I think the estimate is pretty low.
One guy can grow and harvest a lot of cereal grain thanks to machinery.
What matters here is that the US consumer relies IN FACT on illegal labor to get his food to market.
That is not an opinion. It's a fact. And there is no legitimate reason for this. We have the capacity, the machinery, the ink and the paper, to issue any number of visas. The reason is not legitimate, but illegitimate. The feds want to be able to roll up any farmer any time - that's my suspicion.
Now that the ICE capades are playing in theaters near you, these poor **** meskins are saying **** that ****, I'll borrow money from my brother in law. I'm not crossing that **** border - they're shooting white people.
So next season's food is dying in the field. Stand by for serious inflation. All because little trumpy wants some bibi cock...
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?