Today 1:22 am
Which part of that argument is false? It might have been clunky, but it isn't false in its meaning.DeezerShoove » Yesterday, 6:36 pm » wrote: ↑ ****' tards...
Post #135 (yours):
"nato was formed in case a country was attacked, it was not formed so a country could attack another country and then want protection and assistance."
It is a fact that NATO's artical 5 is about assiting in the defense of a member state which is a victim of aggression, and the language unmistakably affirms that alliance members are under no obligation to assist an aggressor who is being answered with violence.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?