JohnnyYou » Today, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑
I am in acceptance of your belief that you thought Ivermectin worked and had success Just not sure I want to risk the treatment without more data.
We are many years from when you were calling it horse paste, and you are still "on the fence" in spite of all the evidence that not one word, not one whisper, not one gesture your controllers made was true. You're a hopeless and spineless jello creature.
They said the vax means it stops with you. Lie.
They said the vax would protect you from it. Lie.
They said the vax was safe and effective. Lie.
You watched them LITERALLY change the definition of vaccine in order to CALL that **** a vax. You watched them tout a dozen different variations of a "vax" mere weeks and short months from first isolating the virus, and it never once occurred to you to ask why the hiv, which had been with us for 50-plus years, was still without a vaccine.
You bought that the same people who cannot cure a fifty year old virus could not only immunize you against a spanking new one, but could do it with human trials occurring 6 weeks from the virus' initial isolation.
No logic - well, no male logic.
And you watched doctors demonized, science politicized. You PARTICIPATED in the politicization of science - all without the capacity to even FIND, much less assess, peer-reviewed science. You accepted the claims of science REPORTERS (journalists) as "science."
So, yeah. You will RELIABLY demonize anyone who proffers a treatment or cure that does not make your owners money, you **** fruitcake.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?