Yesterday 7:12 pm
Both of your papers - the second of which is not even credited to its authors - are based entirely on hypotheticals. I have seen - and published on this board in the vaccine thread - papers which reach an opposite conclusion and are NOT published as editorials.*Roshambo » 31 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Uno
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama-h ... le/2836434
Dos
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9537923/
#N95saveslives
You argument that wearing a mask is good for your health is belied by your own personal activities. You have not placed any extra filtration on your car's exhaust - nor will you, because common sense tells you if you **** with your car's ability to exhale, you will have to pay the mechanic.
Likewise, you do not wear a mask, for the same reason. You don't have the bald-faced gall to deny that only virtue-signaling lesbians are still wearing masks.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?