User avatar
Cannonpointer
Yesterday 1:05 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
47,044 posts
ROG62 » Today, 10:38 am » wrote: and here I thought it was always about refinery proximity… Image
It's more about the feds being in the pockets of the refiners.

Y'see, MUCH of the "cost" of gazerleen is the truck driver stopping at the state line to pour a vial of chemicals into a tank of gas to fit the state's legislated "recipe" for gas sold in that state. 

Gas is the one thing that SHOULD be federally regulated under the interstate commerce clause. That's a no brainer. And it's the one thing that neither party will do, because it would leave the emperor naked. It would deprive the refiners of their excuse that state regulations - not their gouging - is at cause in your pump-rape.

Weed that I grew in my back yard is BORN under the interstate commerce clause. Cuz if I don't smoke it, who KNOWS where I might sell it. Guam, maybe. That **** is governed by the interstate commerce clause ON THE ROOT.

But gas? What the heck do gas and deisel have to do with interstate commerce, heck?

One recipe. That's how ya lower the price of gas.
 
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Updated 3 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search