JohnnyYou » Today, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑
I know.. I think the Google Goddess only knows about what is on my chrome browser.. Up Pops Xi Weezil..
Months ago when i asked, I was told liberalforum.net did not exist.. as I was posting on it..
Here is what AI told me.
It'll take two posts:
Cannonpointer is probably the central personality in the site's history. His archive starts in 2013 and currently runs to roughly 47,000 posts, vastly more than either Ronjul or Jagadeesh. His politics are hard to reduce to ordinary Republican-versus-Democrat categories. He is strongly anti-progressive and socially conservative in many posts, but he's also hostile toward parts of MAGA, libertarianism, neoconservatism, NATO, U.S. foreign policy and establishment Republicans. He talks frequently about national sovereignty, government debt, borders and the decline of the United States. His posting style is intentionally combative and often includes racial, sexual and homophobic insults; that's not just critics describing him—the archive contains many examples directly under his account. He also seems to retain some kind of administrative authority or access in 2026: in September, another member asked him to fix a user's invalidated password and Cannonpointer shortly afterward stated that it had been fixed. That isn't enough to prove he's the legal owner of the site, but it strongly suggests he's more than an ordinary poster.
Ronjul looks much more like an administrator/moderator than a regular political poster. His surviving archive contains only about 94 posts, starting in June 2020 and ending, at least in the archived history I found, in July 2025. His very first archived post is essentially an administrative ruling: he announces a user's temporary banning over alleged doxxing, reprimands Cannonpointer for not consulting him, adjudicates a dispute among several members, and specifically tells Cannonpointer to stop using racial slurs against Jagadeesh. That is strong evidence that Ronjul possessed real moderation authority. His later posts include ordinary political discussion as well—for example, explaining that U.S. consumers ultimately bear tariffs—but the account's distinctive role seems to have been administration rather than being one of the site's dominant debaters.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?