jerrab » Yesterday, 10:32 pm » wrote: ↑
Ok millions.then.
---------------------The Democratic and Republican Parties have not always had the same ideals that they have today. In fact, America's two dominant political parties have essentially flipped ideologies...
Today's democrat party could not BE less liberal.
Today's republican party is peopled with the champions of globalism - an entirely liberal pursuit. Let us all join together as one, each contributing to the whole from its individual strengths, and thereby end the possibility of war be creating such interconnectedness and inter-reliance that a war of conquest, if outstandingly successful, will cost the conqueror more than he gains from that war.
Today's democrat party is peopled by folks who resisted globalism and were only dragged into accepting aspects of it after years of resistance.
Which party is liberal in this matter? BTW, IMO, the democrats were RIGHT on the issue of gloablism, and wrong to let themselves be persuaded. But they were right in their CONSERVATISM and wrong to embrace the republicans' liberal folly.
Republicans insist that blacks be held precisely to the same standard as everyone else and be given the same opportunities with no advantage. The democrat party insists that blacks are too stupid to earn their spot at uni (they use the euphemism "disadvantaged"), too stupid to compete equally in business with the state and must therefore be advantaged by race-based set-asides - hell, too stupid to even get state issued ID, such that voter ID is "racist" against them.
Which party is liberal in this matter? Which insists on treating blacks as equals?
The democrat party led the charge to force me to take an experimental drug for a counterfeit pandemic, insisting on my body, their choice. If that is liberal, so was Hitler. So was Stalin. So was Pol Pot.
You are statist echoers of Wall Street's whims. You have gone so far as to help Wall Street - by which you are occupied - develop a new market for its chemical castration regimine. On what planet is a wall street goon a liberal, you wall street goon?
I can present you with absolute proof that the democrat party is deeply invested in racism: It created programs which allegedly exist to right past wrongs. And in the GENERATIONS that those programs have been in effect, they have not once - ever - run any analysis to see whether and which of these programs - now in the trillions - are working. No attempts to tweak, to validate, to improve. No attempts to get the kind of feedback that programs with GENUINE goals seek ongoingly and with great ardor. These facts prove that the programs are ends in themselves and NOT means to any end such as "righting past wrongs." Were they so, they would be getting monitored with the greatest possible precison and being tweaked along toward the desired end.
You are not a liberal. You are a bigot. You are not open to debate. You are a shrill screecher from an uncompromising set of tenents. Your ears are closed to all but slavish agreement and reinforcement. Any who disagree are OF THE DEVIL. In its very ROLLOUT through "An Inconvenient Truth," Climate change demanded immediate and unquestioning faith OR ELSE (or else you are a bad faith actor OF THE DEVIL). Dialogue and compromise are impossibilities with your kind. Questions of your absolutist orthodoxy are not tolerated. One either subscribes to EVERY TENENT of your party or one is the enemy - no deviation, no diversity of thought. You operate off of precepts, and your only friends and allies are those who subscribe to those precepts.
Today's democrat party could not BE less liberal.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?