22 Jul 2014 6:01 pm
If the employer mandate to provide employees health coverage is not yet in force, how are they mandated to cover abortifacients?golfboy » 22 Jul 2014 5:47 pm » wrote: You made the claim. I'm not surprised that you refuse to support it though.
They DID base it on religious grounds but they did NOT argue 1st Amendment infringement. As I already explained, and linked for proof, they based their argument on the 1993 Democrat Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA).
It had been implemented. Had it not, they would not have had standing to sue.
Of course not. I'm having too much fun kicking your *** and correcting your blatant misstatements.