22 Jul 2014 6:59 pm
So if Hobby Lobby simply refused to provide any coverage at all, they could have avoided the Supreme Court until the mandate became enforced?Cedarswamp » 22 Jul 2014 6:46 pm » wrote: It's part of the "acceptable plans" that every policy must comply with.
i view Hobby Lobby's appeal to the Supreme Court on the basis of a religious objection as being an acknowledgement of the employer mandate, on a whole, which gives me no hope that it will be overturned as I believe it should be.