golfboy » 16 Feb 2016 12:47 pm » wrote:
It's not a matter of being smart or not. His number is working vs not working. He's not quoting some government statistic, that has been lied about anyway, to get this fictitious 5% unemployment rate.
Was the criteria used in unemployment numbers different during the Bush administration?
Just trying to figure out if this is a new fangled way of playing with the numbers or if Obama inherited it. I seem to recall it was no different during the Bush administration.