2 Jan 2014 11:11 am
Misty » 01 Jan 2014 3:54 pm » wrote:
Again, which would be more cost effective?
Routine tests and doctor's visits that would diagnose cancers early, or treating cancer in it's advanced stages?
How about answering Misty's question, Clem? It's a perfectly legitimate one. This is why you have no credibility on this forum. You avoid any question posed to you by slithering into your cockroach infested nest and pulling out one insult after another, just to avoid having to answer a question that might cause you to think objectively.RichClem » 02 Jan 2014 9:31 am » wrote: Oh gosh, a cherry picked set-up question.No, government programs and free stuff don't save money.
You're a very dishonest and disturbed man, Clem. I'd be frightened to have you as my neighbor and I'd be very wary of you around my children, my pets and my possessions.