The bottom line is only as good as the environment that produced it and only as good as what contributed to it. If 40% of the bottom line is comprised of ill-gotten or fabricated assets, the bottom line is tainted. We've certainly seen this.crimsongulf » 16 Feb 2014 12:41 pm » wrote: Not throwing rocks here either. IN my corporate days, I have seen many an exec on the way out due to failure try to claim success with numbers.
Only numbers that matter are bottom line numbers.
Given enough google time, one can contradict any number or graph posted on this forum, but it never changes the bottom line.