There is no reasonable argument, it was a retarded policy shift. I’m glad they walked it back,Blackvegetable » 17 Jun 2025, 11:59 am » wrote: ↑ You are clearly missing the point (which should have been suggested by the title, bold text, and statement). Yet you insist on framing my argument.
Why don't you instead frame a reasoned argument for the original policy and subsequent flip flops?