Cannonpointer's Internet Barrister
2,297 posts
greatnpowerfuloz » 22 Jul 2014 6:59 pm » wrote:
So if Hobby Lobby simply refused to provide any coverage at all, they could have avoided the Supreme Court until the mandate became enforced?
i view Hobby Lobby's appeal to the Supreme Court on the basis of a religious objection as being an acknowledgement of the employer mandate, on a whole, which gives me no hope that it will be overturned as I believe it should be.
Would you have preferred they end all coverage for their employees until the mandate kicked in? I have my doubts the mandate will ever kick in.