You're the one trying to define opposition research as collusion, yet you were the one posting the rumors in the Steele dossier. Were you colluding with a British national to affect the outcome of a federal election?Misty » 12 Jul 2017 11:06 pm » wrote: Okay.
Steele's research was initially funded by Republicans who did not want Trump to be the Republican Party nominee for president.
So we can start there.
Yeah. It's just me protesting.