Cannonpointer » 16 Feb 2014 1:37 pm » wrote:
Make up your mind. In your math, you show
-0.2 as the third number, using the October fiscal year as the measuring stick. But in your follow-on explanation, you use
-0.2 as the hand-off year, using the election year as the measuring stick. This type of mathematical mishmash is poor presentation, son.
I will get to your presentation soon, so please: Try to refine it in the interim, make it less dishonest.
Sorry man, but in order for your chart to be true, than it is me using the correct numbers.
Let's review again, shall we?
Annual GDP:
1977 4.6
1978 5.6
1979 3.2
1980 -0.2
1981 2.6
Your graph shows Carter's number at 3.4% average growth during his Presidency
1977 through 1980 (4.6 + 5.6 + 3.2 + -0.2) / 4 = 3.4
1978 through 1981 (5.6 + 3.2 + -0.2 + 2.6) / 4 = 2.8
According to your own graph and numbers, in order to get a 3.4% gdp, Carter took an economy running at 4.6% and handed it off at
-0.2%
So are disputing your own graph, or are you just wrong about the numbers?
Math is hard for liberals.