17 Feb 2014 7:48 am
No, actually I used ONE set of numbers and ONLY one set of numbers, it was YOU who presented conflicting data.Cannonpointer » 16 Feb 2014 11:24 pm » wrote:
As I made clear in the OP, retard, I don't trust people JUST LIKE YOU to be honest about the numbers. People like you will bounce between sets, depending on which best serves their current argument. I mentioned both sets of numbers, and stated that I was willing to argue my thesis, to wit: THAT CARTER WAS BETTER ON THE ECONOMY THAN REAGAN, with either set of numbers BUT NOT BOTH.
You have consistently tried to use both. You use 1980 to argue that Carter left with a stagnant (not growing or shrinking) economy. You used 1981 to deprive Carter of 1976 and drop his overall performance stats.
Once you have picked ONE SET (1976-1980, or 1977-1981), I will debate the numbers with you. Until then, we will all watch you screech ineffectually and dishonestly.
Your chart uses one set of numbers, and you quoted the other. Pick one set, you don't get both.