17 Feb 2014 3:51 pm
I love that you're trying to lay your failure off on me.Cannonpointer » 17 Feb 2014 3:46 pm » wrote: My OP offered to argue EITHER, because I know how dishonest you are.
YOU CHOOSE.
Do you want the set that turns the economy over to reagan at -.002 growth (basically, a flat economy), or do you want the one that gives Carter a lower OVERALL score?
You cannot have both, and I will argue neither with you until you agree to stick with one and only one throughout the argument.
YOU claimed that I used the wrong dates, and you used the that graph showing Carter with 3.4% growth to support it.
YOU were wrong.