9 Jan 2015 6:08 am
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzCannonpointer » 09 Jan 2015 5:44 am » wrote: That sounds mighty scurrilous, Suzie. That is just awful.
We're trying to sully an excellent record and pass off a worthless hack as a much better president than he was, ya say, Nancy Panties?
AND ALL YOU ARE COMPETENT TO DO IS WHINE ABOUT IT, YOU LITTLE BITCH - JUST LIKE YOUR SISTERS GOOEY AND CLEMJOB?
I would think ONE of you effeminate fappers would have the google fu of an adolescent and the analytical and presentation abilities of an adult. The numbers are are the numbers, little girl. I have countless posts exposing the numbers, making my case from carefully studied and presented evidence. But a lie is hard to argue, no matter how clever one is. The facts are the facts.
Who is it that might be lying? The man who lists source after source, presents graph after graph and chart after chart? Or the crybaby bitch who has 15 posts in the other thread on this subject, and not ONE source, not ONE link, not ONE argument other than a name call?
And here you come again, Nancy Panties, lisping in here with your effeminate pretense of posting, STEADFASTLY avoiding the TOPIC, and making your projection of my supposed motives the topic. You're not a poster at all. You're a coward and a bring nothing hack. In thread after thread you duck the OP and post rumors, gossip, and other chuck stuff, ya pansy.
I've busted you out all over this board - and I am exposing you for what you are in all of these reagan threads, sonny, along with your butt buddy, goofy. How sad for you two *** that clem has brought more to these threads than the two of you put together - and clem is a notoriously weak sister, sister.
Now, post sometyhng else about ME instead of taking on the subject, and prove that you're an eager cocksucker with the same craving for my dick that your mother displays when I visit the local whorehouse, boy.
No offense.
