Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » 12 Jan 2015 5:32 am » wrote:Here's a graph I took off a queer who posts charts that he doesn't even understand:

http://acivilamericandebate.com/2011/04 ... ud-part-3/



As the graph clearly shows, Carter's worst year was flat, unlike the worst years of his predecessors, and his correction was well underway before he handed over the government to retard ronnie in the second quarter of fiscal year 1981. That year's growth was 2.6%.

.

Which has almost nothing to do with actual reality.

That's what happens when an ignorant psychotic looks at a chart and offers a wild guess.

No, the economy as Reagan entered office was in chaos and on the verge of collapse. Your, snicker, "correction" was a dead cat bounce before the collapse continued.

Carter's numbers were in a significant upward trajectory at handoff.

Find a mainstream source to back that up, psycho.

The chart also shows that Reagan's big spending could only artificially stimulate the economy for a few years.

Where did you say that huge Obama Boom was hiding, psycho?

Oh that's right, you dodged the question and babbled some psychotic nonsense.

After it overheated, it went into free fall, costing Bush his job.

A moderate recession is "free fall?" Only in the moonbat dictionary.