Cannonpointer » 12 Jan 2015 5:24 pm » wrote:Take it up with Wiki, you ***.
There it is, you **** mouthed, lying sack of ****. So just shut the **** up - your **** doesn't fly here, ***. Your pretense that you're too stupid to understand what you're responding to is rejected, ***. If you can't keep up, go the **** away. We don;t need first graders, you bleating moron. I made my language crystal clear - as can be seen above. And I provided the quote above, and I linked the quote to the source.
I did my job. I stated my thesis, backed it with evidence, and sourced the evidence.
It's your duty to understand what you're responding to, you ***-felching wad of used toilet paper.
Wow, who would ever think you're mentally impaired?
Say, if little jimmy carter was so great on the economy, why did the liberal New Republic call him a failure toward the end of his presidency?
Why did liberals "turn on him?"
Maybe because you're an imbecile and an ignoramus, perhaps?
I remember as a mere callow college student when I made out that Jimmy Carter was finished:
when liberals turned on him. For example, Ken Bode, then the revered moderator of “Washington Week in Review” on PBS, wrote in 1979 “It’s Over For Jimmy” in
The New Republic:
“The past two weeks will be remembered as the period when President Carter packed it in, put the finishing touches on a failed presidency”
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2 ... elding.php