17 Jan 2015 4:26 pm
Because I make one minor mistake, "I don't understand what I post."Cannonpointer » 17 Jan 2015 3:58 pm » wrote: The rest was too long, I didn't bother to ead it. I have no particular reason to believe you understood it, anyway. It could be uncritically copy-pasted blather from a blog. It would have taken time for me to discern whether it was or wasn't, and my time is suddenly a precious commodity where you are concerned, copy-paste clem.
In other words, go **** yourself, fraud. Now I know: You don't understand what you post. There's no reason for me to respond to a blind copy paster which might or might not be a machine or a retarded man, unless I feel like it, for the benefit of others. You don't count, because you don't understand \what YOU post, much less what I post.
After someone explains this post, you really should go **** yourself, hack.
Pretty hilarious coming from someone with a psychotic view of Economics and history.
I have on my side liberal Time, liberal Newsweek, the liberal New Republic, all the networks at the time, every business publication I've ever seen, most historians most of whom are liberal, National Review, American Spectator, Weekly Standard, Human Events, etc, etc.
You have on your side your own psychotic analysis and accompanying delusions.