22 Mar 2013 3:36 pm
Given that you claimed, among many comical false claims, that spending was lowest under of Obama than any other modern president, you're obviously completely full of crap. Under Obama, annualized federal spending growth slowest in decades. A blatant lie that even Obama-fawning journalists refused to accept. Save your swill for other moonbats. I repeat, TARP was a one-time spending event. Your source dishonestly pretends otherwise. Obama and Dems boosted spending to roughly 25% of GDP and have fought to maintain every penny. Your silly propaganda is worthless. How many babies starved under Saddam Hussein? Why don't you have pictures of them? How many innocent Iraqis were butchered under him? He was directly responsible for the deaths of roughly 1 million Iraqis. You stupidly claimed that Iraqis were better off under that mass murderer than under freedom now. What an utter hack you are. So, IOW you're saying that you're okay with the use of depleted uranium and white phosphorus by the Bush administration, and the ensuing results on children? Saddam was a bad man, so that makes it okay in your eyes. I'm saying in the real world, there is a choice between evil and relative good. Saving 17 million Iraqis was a huge, if relative, good despite having to use depleted uranium, which has little health hazard. Your source is blatantly anti-American, anti-science Propaganda. Dishonest moonbats like you pretend Iraqis were better off under Saddam Hussein.