30 Mar 2013 11:43 am
Instead you smeared him as a "molester" of her daughter, accusing him of being a child molester.That's a lie. I had remembered hearing something about a scandal involving John Fund and the daughter of his ex-girlfriend, but I didn't know what it was all about, which is why I asked the question.Since when is asking a question a smear?Right and I had no idea how old she was when I asked the question.Oh gosh, just an innocent question. Yeah, sure, right. Totally believable, coming from the Lying Leftist who for years has dishonestly defended an actual, real life rapist.If you didn't know how old she was, you could have googled the incident before smearing him, but heck no, then a smear would have been impossible.Smear first, make excuses afterwardsDidn't John Fund molest his girlfriend's daughter?F*** you and f*** your endless smears and bulls*** excuses.You're first and foremost a smear artist, professional liar and deceitful propaganda artist.You obviously have the morals of an alley cat.I hope for their sake, you don't own any pets.Oh look, a new smear.From the defender of an actual rapist, who smeared the victim.What kind of morals does that take?So the tearful statement of the victim and her 3, 4 contemporaneous witnesses who saw her distress that day and her badly bitten lip, including a nurse who treated her, have no credibility whatsover to little Miss Marxist.....Miss Broaddrick and her so-called witnesses were likely on Richard Mellon Scaife's payrollYou dishonestly defended the rapist but attacked the rape victim.Go get some professional counseling.