No, it wasn't, you **** liar! Here you are, yet AGAIN, putting something in there that you decide to put in there because you're dishonest as the day is long. I said exactly what my position has always been and continues to be, and that is the foundation **** will either be investigated or it will not be investigated. And yeah, I said you're not well, which you aren't.
Now that you can't prove that he was right, you've decided to leave all that foundation stuff to further investigation.
The disingenuous assumption being that I was TRYING to prove him right, being the dishonest hack you are. My whole perspective on Whore Clinton is her **** felonies with those **** emails, and the foundation **** is way in the background to that. And since you don't give the first **** about her exposing information that could very well lead to deaths, I said that you're not well, and you aren't. What kind of a **** bitch doesn't give a **** about what that whore provably did? I bet you gave lots of **** about Scooter Libby who did nothing anywhere near what this whore did.
Helluva try there Mr.Larry.
Next time you think about reflexively jumping in to defend someone, you might want to do a little research first.
There was no "try" to it. I stated a fact. Quote me defending Sarge's position on the foundation ****. I'll await your reply.