4 Aug 2017 10:22 am
No, I didn't miss any point. You said what he did and said about it was "damning". OK, he ogled girls in a dressing room and you call that "damning". Think that of him if you so choose and I don't like what he did either, but should I be damning him, condemning him for that when the other side of the coin ignores all it has? I'm sorry, but I can't quite wrap my mind around that one-sidedness. Bill Clinton did far more "damning" things with women than did Trump - he just didn't admit to it like Trump has. What I said is not this "but...but...what about" like you want to characterize it. It's about double standards and the results of those double standards, and it goes beyond JUST double standards as we witness right now. Is it not evident to you that the special counsel on Trump and the election without the same for Hillary and her unlawful handling of classified information is subversion of the rule of law in this country? I didn't vote for Trump, but I don't know what he could have done that measures up to exposing Top Secret information to the world, yet he is the one being investigated while Hillary walks away unscathed. That's not a but...but....it's about our Constitution and the rule of law it provides. You ought to be just as concerned about that as I.indago » 04 Aug 2017 9:38 am » wrote:
Another But... but... what about... posting.
You missed the point...