5 Aug 2017 9:34 am
Where you get all that ****, I don't know. Myths.....O.E. » 04 Aug 2017 12:35 pm » wrote:
Say, Larry, how long have you been running with that putrid collection of myths? All do it, Dems do worse, but get away Scot free, while Special Prosecutors only go after the GOP?
Say what you will, but the POTUS has the right to discuss classified info with foreign powers. What law did he break? Maybe he should not have, maybe he should have, but what law did he break? Hillary **** broke the law!The Trumpy actually transferred information, classified at the highest level, to a hostile nation, undermining or even destroying the international intelligence cooperation upon which we depend for our security.
#1 - whether or not those classified emails exposed were used or will be used to undermine national security and/or operatives is irrelevant to the law. How would you or I know what someone out there has that can be used to our detriment?There is no evidence that any of the information Hillary had on her private server ever leaked out, and you can bet your arse, if it had, we'd have heard about it by now. The Trumpy gets a pass from you, Hillary doesn't.
#2 - You say we would have known about it by now. Why this then? http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/lawsuit-did-hillarys-secret-email-damage-national-security/article/2618011
And what classified information? Can you tell me? It's pretty obvious to me that you don't know the first thing about the severity of mishandling classified documentation.Oh yeah, then there's the little fact that Hillary did just as Powell did before her, and several dozen White House officials doing official business, amounting to tens of millions of emails, over a - private! - RNC server.
Where do you get that now?So yes, there's precedent for the way in which Hillary proceeded, upon Powell's advice. Powell gets a pass from you, so do several dozen Bush White House officials, Hillary doesn't.
How I love the inferences you leftists love making. FYI, Powell gets no pass whatsoever from me if he was exposing classified documents, nor does anyone else, GOP or not. Yeah, the same who investigated Hillary and declared no harm, no foul with her after she provably broke the **** law. "No intent found"...which is **** and irrelevant to the law aside from treasonous intent.Moreover, remember Starr? Need I say more? Ah yes, in your view it is the height of injustice that Mueller goes after the Trumpy every which way a competent prosecutor would, installed by, wait for it, a Republican-appointed assistant AG. This assistant AG had no other way to proceed after the Trumpy admitted he fired the formerly investigating FBI chief (the same who investigated Hillary) because Comey wouldn't let the Russia investigation go. So, the Trumpy in his very finite wisdom, brought this prosecutor upon himself. Cue your whining about it. That Hillary had been investigated by the very man the Trumpy fired doesn't show up in your account.
Yep, she sure as hell did.But hey, Hillary is known to have "committed crime after crime"
crimes you don't bother to name, so-called "crimes" the FBI boss, whom the Trumpy fired, didn't think warranted charges (neither did anyone else in the U.S. justice system
Oh, that's a nice try, pal. She had CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS on an unsecured server of her own and that is against the law. And no one else in the justice system thought she warranted charges? What are you smoking? http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/05 ... iring.html
"Veteran FBI agents say FBI Director James Comey has permanently damaged the bureau’s reputation for uncompromising investigations with his “cowardly” whitewash of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s mishandling of classified information using an unauthorized private email server."
http://nypost.com/2016/10/06/fbi-agents ... ton-probe/
IF Trump broke the law, then he pays the legal consequences. There is no "if" with Clinton. That's no pass for Trump; you're the one giving the pass to a proven law breaking Clinton.who had a say on the matter, including one Mr. Jefferson Beauregard Sessions), but the Trumpy does get a pass from you, whereas Hillary doesn't.
I believe in the rule of law and you call that a joke. OK...whatever floats your leftwing progressive boat.You know what is funny about that? I'll tell you: All of it. Most of all that you would even so much as try to dress up with an equitable flair. Really, Larry, do realize you yourself are the punch line of a joke you forgot to tell.