And I love how you just make that statement.Misty » 02 Dec 2017 4:07 pm » wrote: I love how you just dismiss his crazy Tweets, because you can't justify them.
FYI, I agree with you and others that some of those tweets are 1) not necessary and 2) bring more harm than good. OTOH, he uses them to combat the news media who have it their way and only their way in their reporting otherwise. Maybe you don't care about things such as these, but I do and so do most Americans:https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/trump-says-reports-of-tillerson-ouster-are-fake-news
https://news.teletrader.com/trump-fake-news-reporting-comeys-lies/news/details/41344730?ts=1512319848661
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/02/us/brian-ross-suspended-abc.html
Neither of which relate to Trump colluding with anyone.Two indictments and two guilty pleas so far.
And your proof of that is? It didn't get to you and change YOUR vote, did it?A bunch of people who were private citizens at the time negotiating with the foreign adversary that meddled in our election, in order to undermine America's foreign policy.
Well, let me ask you a few questions.That hardly gives you the high ground on who you chose to support.
1. Do you support small businesses now being able to get loans for expansion?
2. Do you support corporations bringing their manufacturing, etc., back to this country?
3. Do you support the repatriation of trillions of dollars?
4. Do you support a crackdown on crime in the inner-cities, specifically gangs?
5. Do you support Americans before illegals? I notice you didn't say a thing about Kate Steinle and Sanctuary SF that 1) allowed her death in the first place, then 2) set the **** free without even an involuntary manslaughter conviction.
Those are just a few policies/agenda that I indeed support and call it taking the high road if you wish, but they are more important than twitter, to me. To you, they apparently aren't. And fake whatever videos retweeted simply do not compare to years of compromising classified information, even though he should not have done that, IMO. You've never said one word about that bitch doing what she has been proven to have done, at least not that I've seen. All you want to do is tell everyone how irrelevant the bitch is, but that isn't true. Those exposed classified emails are still exposed.
Yeah, I do know, but you don't say a word about Hillary's doing exactly that over years, which once again, makes you a blatant, unashamed hypocrite.You know what jeopardizes REAL lives?
Re-Tweeting FAKE anti-Muslim videos put out by a violent fringe group in Great Britain.
That puts our embassy personnel in foreign countries in danger.
But don't take my word for it, 45's own State Dept said so.
We'll see if that happens, but I can tell you this. I won't say what you said about Benghazi and her lies...nothing.What are you going to say when we have another Benghazi that actually is caused by those videos?