15 Mar 2014 1:19 pm
Lol...Reagan's job numbers in his second term were better than Carter's kiddo. So unless you have evidence that Carter's job numbers would have been the same in a potential second term you're just posturing and trying to fudge the data.Cannonpointer » 12 Mar 2014 7:27 pm » wrote:
You have already seen the jobs created during the Carter years - more per year than Reagan by over 25%, and a higher percentage of them full time. How do you justify just breezing past more than ten million jobs in 4 years - a better jobs record than any president past or present? Are jobs - like borrowing and spending - not "part of the economy?"
If you want to have a discussion about Reagan's deficit spending I'll do it with you, but you can't say Reagan's economy was better because he increased the debt and Carter's was worse because of the gold standard and high energy prices in a thread where you're trying to show Carter's economy was better. Seriously Cannon, do you not see the contradictory nature of that???