7 Apr 2014 12:00 am
Because inflation is considered part of economic growth and it must be adjusted as such. You're percente argument is incredibly retarded. Using your logic, if someone grew the debt from $1 to $100 they'd be a worse president as far as debt goes than anyone in history, but I think adding $5 trillion in 4 years like this current guy has is just a little worse.Cannonpointer » 06 Apr 2014 10:43 pm » wrote:
Explain whiy you insist we account for inflation in quantifying Carter's economy yet ignore when assiduously referring to obie's debt only in whole numbers, not percentages. Explain why you continue to equate the real jobs Carter created with the McJobs your shill manipulated into existence through the tax code.
We both know you're having reaganomic fun with numbers.
As for Reagan's McJobs, income fell during Carter's presidency. It grew by more than 10% while Reagan was in office.
Thinks sucked under Carter, at least that's what I've been told, and that's why he didn't get re-elected.