16 May 2017 8:52 pm
And still not a verifiable source. TDS gone wildMisty » 15 May 2017 9:27 pm » wrote: Well, so far I've read that the WH asked WaPo to hold back certain details from the story because they were too sensitive.
And they didn't deny that 45 gave the Russians classified info.
They said “at no time were any intelligence sources or methods discussed and no military operations were disclosed that were not already known publicly.”
The article did not allege those things.
They call that a none denial denial.
Unnamed sources are nothing new.
Don't forget, it was an unnamed source called Deep Throat that brought down a president.
P.S. Guess what didn't leak out from that meeting?
The POTUS telling the Russians to stop **** with our elections.
That's what he should have been telling them.