Liberal Forum

*Beekeeper » 20 Apr 2025, 6:32 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Apr 2025, 6:32 pm

And now, the REAL IRONY of her "lawfare" is about to be EXPOSED!! Seems there are PROCEEDINGS to DISBARR HER because LYING ON MORTGAGE APPLICATIONS is a serious FRAUD and FRAUD is more than grounds for DISBARRMENT. NO CONVICTION NEEDED EITHER in NY STATE!!

Sucks for her!!

Popcorn time for the FAT ASSED BITCH's DRAMA AND PUNISHMENT!! I imagine that our MAGNIFICANT AG is going to toss the ENTIRE FEDERAL REGISTRY at her that she can. AND ask for the MAXIMUM PRISON SENTENCE SHE CAN GET because an "officer of the court" should ABSOLUTELY know better than to commit FRAUD. But being BLACK, in Laticia's mind, gives her a "free pass" to do whatever the **** she wants. AS it has OTHER BLACK PROSECUTORS!!

https://x.com/SteveMcNY/status/19129616 ... d-n2188085

New York Attorney General Letitia James didn’t just misclassify her five-unit Brooklyn brownstone as a “4-family dwelling” on mortgage documents. As we’ve previously reported, this distinction is not trivial—properties with five or more units are considered commercial and subject to stricter lending rules. But our latest investigation reveals something even more troubling: on multiple occasions, James described the property as a “1-family,” “1–2 family,” or even “1–3 family” dwelling—designations that offer even greater mortgage advantages than the 4-family classification, including lower interest rates, reduced reserve requirements, and easier approval thresholds.

 This isn’t a minor paperwork discrepancy. Five-unit buildings are classified as commercial properties under federal lending guidelines, subject to stricter underwriting standards, higher down payments, and less favorable terms. By repeatedly downgrading the unit count—sometimes to as low as a single-family home—James may have accessed residential mortgage products exclusively designed for primary residences with substantially more favorable terms.

 The official Certificate of Occupancy for 296 Lafayette Avenue clearly and explicitly states “Five (5) Family Dwelling” in all capital letters. This official document, dated January 26, 2001, establishes the legal occupancy status of the building: View Certificate of Occupancy

 Yet just two months after that Certificate of Occupancy was issued, James signed mortgage documents describing the property as a “One or Two Family” dwelling—the most aggressive misclassification possible, delivering the greatest mortgage advantages under residential lending programs.