Cannonpointer » 26 Jun 2022, 12:24 pm » wrote: ↑ I decline the challenge. I remain 100% certain that you are offended by speech. The odds that you would submit equanimously, for example, to an impassioned defense of pedophilia - or worse, a trite, cadged, tepid one - are slim. I know that I have neither the proclivity nor the desire to brook such unbrookableness.
No, we are all subject to be offended by speech - and rightly. It is words that convey ideas, words that motivate action, words that give men wives and children, words that send men to their deaths, words that make men to deserve or not deserve those deaths.
My declintion to put up with cum mouths does not reflect any enmity for the First Amerndment; indeed, I find that implictation profoundly, almost unplumbably shallow. My refusal to give ear to verminous discharge simply reflects mature discernment and a firm commitment to not put up with that which ought not be put up with. Letting weak **** open their necks at me isn't a thing I need to do in order to prove my self-respect. Indeed, it is my self-respect which motivates cutting the floor out from beneath them.
On top of that, each of the axed ****-asses FIRST mouth shat, THEN got the boot. Perhaps I will go fetch their "contributions" and restore those to the thread, for your edification - and in celebration of our Glorious Constitution, which 'twould appear you believe obligates you to let *** breath their odious stench in your ear.