Liberal Forum

Vegas » 12 Aug 2023, 9:36 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Aug 2023, 9:36 pm

80 cameras and not one of them showed anything? Come on. Then what would be the point of confiscating them if their content was of no value?

I dismiss it because it is 'claimed' to be the case. Proving me wrong should be easy. All you have to do is show me the plane wreck at the pentagon. You showed me pics of a wreckage. There is no evidence that was from the pentagon. It could be from anywhere. There was only one pic you showed me that had a piece in the lawn. Two problems: 1. If you look at the background, the crews already put out most of the fire, it was just smoke. That means That pic could have been taken up to a couple hours after the crash. 2. Look at that piece. It looks like it was washed and even waxed. Hell, my car doesn't look that clean after I wash and wax it. 

This is what would convince me: 
1. Pics of wreckage outside the pentagon such as pieces of the tail or wings. 
2. Burn marks on the ground where the official 9/11 report claimed the plane hit before it hit the wall. 
3. A credible reason as to why all 80 cameras were confiscated. 

The claim is that a plane hit the pentagon. Billions of people are claiming that. What I claim could have happened is irrelevant. The burden of proof is on the original claim. Not me.