11 Sep 2023 5:31 pm
Very clear. What is decidedly unclear is if a failed occupation/sit in show of civil disobedience rises to the level of sedition. Unarmed, most were non violent. It wasn't an insurrection, it was a photo op that wasn't nearly as violent as it's orchestrators intended. Headlines were already printed days in advance. This was supposed to be a mass casualty event. Instead the only violent death was an unarmed protester.maineman » 11 Sep 2023, 5:02 pm » wrote: ↑ The 14th is pretty clear... if you rebel against the Constitution, or you provide aid or comfort to those who do, you are Constitutionally DISQUALIFIED from holding further public office at any level of government.