19 Sep 2023 11:58 am
Who decides what is true? Dissenting views should be available in the public discourse to determine their merit. Forbidding topics under penalty of law is not only draconian, it feeds into the conspiracy. "There must be some truth in the viewpoint or it wouldn't be illegal to discuss in public".Bruce » 19 Sep 2023, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑ Canada does not **** around with vaccine deniers.
Canada has freedom of true speech in public.
For example, denying the Holocaust is a crime as well as denying the safety and effectiveness of vaccines.
What social purpose is served by hateful lies?