27 Sep 2023 3:24 pm
Controlled demolition makes the most sense....if you spend weeks/months preparing a building for a controlled demolition. Buildings that size would require thousands of tonnes of support structures removed. Ever seen a tour of a building about to be demolished? No one could take their Starbucks to the 79th floor of one of these buildings and not clearly see something wrong. That would have to be seeing something wrong for months without reporting it.Vegas » 27 Sep 2023, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑ Many pilots and engineers have come forward and expressed their doubts about the formal report of 9/11. They gave pretty compelling reasons as to why the report is false. Engineers have given multiple reasons as to how a demolition would be more probably than the floors just buckling.
it's a **** distraction. You and people like you get real questions ignored. "Who profited from 911?" And other valid lines of inquiry are quashed with guilt by association. "Yer one of those idiots that believe the government controlled demolished, ain't ya?"
Plenty of real conspiracies to investigate, controlled demolition of skyscrapers isn't one.