A threat has to be credible to be a threat. Unarmed idiots **** on walls is monkey blm behavior beneath the conservative cause but it was no insurrection. Having a slate of alternate electors isn't an insurrection. As for a bloodless coup look no further than Russiagate. No further than Hillary Clinton's claim the election was stolen by Russia. That was far from a peaceful transfer of power.maineman » 23 Oct 2023, 4:28 pm » wrote: ↑ a threat does not need to be armed to be credible. The term "bloodless coup" exists for a reason.
If the fake electors scheme had been successful, and if Pence had done what the clown wanted him to do instead of what the constitution directed him to do, the outcome could have been completely different.