*Huey » Today, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑
I didn't say you did. But your education on this topic requires it and I said I would.
It is very relevant. Your fear of these weapons is based on who is attracted to it by appearance. So what happens when there is a ban, like in the 90s, manufactures build the same existing weapon without those features. The weapon operates the same, is still mean and scary, and still attracts the same people you fear.
Here is your L.
Blackvegetable » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
*Huey » Today, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑
I didn't say you did. But your education on this topic requires it and I said I would.
It is very relevant. Your fear of these weapons is based on who is attracted to it by appearance. So
So, it was irrelevant...as I stated.
It is very relevant. Your fear of these weapons is based on who is attracted to it by appearance
That is not the stand I have taken.
You persist in lying about it....ironic, since you also insist I don't take stands, except for vague ones.
So the rest of that **** isn't worth reading.
I take your response as a tacit admission that you do not care about function. That you only care about appearance. Remember that SCHV stay you have been vomiting for years? Once you remove the cosmetics and visuals that make up the bans you still have a firearm that shoots the same **** SCHV **** round.
It is all about looks for you. That is why your knee jerk reaction was to ban this firearm:
That is a 22. It shoots 22 LR Rimfire. But you yelled, BAN IT! **** moron.