Blackvegetable » 34 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
The funny thing is that I've already done so, more than once....in detail, at length.
You continue to refuse to identify the citation to which your question refers.
There's no question who is running...
Now you are back you did..
*Huey » 11 Jun 2025, 3:31 pm » wrote: ↑
*Huey » 11 Jun 2025, 2:46 pm » wrote: ↑
I have already won. You are on an epic Forrest Gump run avoiding the challenge from last year.
The Sporter was never military combat issue because it was designed for civilian use.
The Sporter is listed on the civilian list because it is designed for civilian use.
You clam you have honestly answer it. Then you agree with the following.
1. The Sporter was not designed for combat and was never issued as a combat weapon.
2. The Sporter was on the civilian list because it was designed as a civilian.
If you disagree you did not answer the challenge honestly and you are lying claiming you already did. Quite the catch 22, *******. Not as smart as you think you are.
Blackvegetable » 11 Jun 2025, 5:21 pm » wrote: ↑
*Huey » 11 Jun 2025, 4:58 pm » wrote: ↑
I did . You said you already answered it honestly. If you answered it honestly your must agree that:
1. The Colt Sporter is not on the military list because it was not designed for combat.
2. The Colt Sporter is not on the civilian list because it was designed for civilians.
Those are the only two honest answers. You **** lost ****.
Do not bother me any more with this bullshti. Bumping this post will be my response.
Good Night ****** Who Runs Too Far.
What a **** loser.
1) ****.
2) ****
I gave the honest answers.
If you can find a lie in my words, show me.
.if not, it's time to go back to the point of the article.